Skip to main content

Key Takeaways

  • Serviceability is measured on income rather than net worth, so a large balance sheet can still produce a small borrowing figure.
  • Investment income is usually accepted at a discount, with rent commonly shaded and growth portfolios contributing less than their value suggests.
  • Structure often matters more than rate, through standalone security, interest-only periods and the sharper pricing that substantial equity attracts.
  • Negative gearing reform passed in June 2026 changes the after-tax cash flow on established rental property bought after Budget night.

Plenty of Australians own several properties, a share portfolio and a healthy superannuation balance, then get declined for a modest loan. An asset rich cash flow poor home loan application usually fails on one point. Lenders measure what your assets pay you each month, not what they are worth.

Net worth feels like the obvious test, and a borrower holding millions in unencumbered property looks safe on any commercial reading. Credit assessment does not work that way.

That gap can usually be closed, though rarely by the lender you already bank with. Policies differ widely on which investment income counts, how heavily it is discounted and which security structures are acceptable. A broker for asset rich borrowers can work out where your position reads more favourably before anything is lodged.

Why Lenders Look Past Your Net Worth

Security asks what a lender recovers if things go wrong. Serviceability asks whether the loan can be repaid from income without hardship. A large asset base answers the first and does nothing for the second:

Serviceability Ahead of Security

Every regulated home loan is assessed on your capacity to meet repayments from income. Equity affects pricing, the loan-to-value ratio (LVR) and whether lenders mortgage insurance applies, but it does not stand in for cash flow. A borrower with 70% equity and thin income is often assessed more harshly than one with 20% equity and a steady salary.

Obligations Under Responsible Lending Rules

Credit providers and brokers must make reasonable enquiries into your circumstances and verify what you tell them. A loan that could only be repaid by selling the security is generally treated as unsuitable, however comfortable the equity looks. Brokers also owe a best interests duty, which means recommending the option that suits you rather than the one that clears fastest.

Limits Set by the Regulator

Whatever income is accepted is then stress-tested. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority requires repayments to be assessed at a rate at least 3 percentage points above the one you are offered. A debt-to-income cap has applied since February 2026, restricting how much of a bank’s new lending can go to borrowers owing six times their income or more. Both settings press hardest where wealth is large and income is not.

Assets Outside the Income Test

Vacant land, a holiday house the family uses, a growth-weighted share portfolio paying little in dividends and digital assets all sit on your net worth statement and contribute nothing to serviceability. Owner-occupied property is the clearest case. Borrowers past 55 have a separate pathway through equity release without selling, though for everyone else the family home adds security without adding a dollar of assessable income.

Enquiries Left by Earlier Applications

Every credit application leaves a mark on your file, and several in a short window signal to the next assessor that others have already said no. Asset rich borrowers collect these quickly, approaching two or three banks in turn on the assumption that equity will eventually carry the decision. Checking policy before lodging protects the file for the application that succeeds.

Investment Income Lenders May Count

Not every dollar your assets produce counts as income, and what does count usually arrives discounted. These are the streams that carry weight:

Rent From Investment Properties

Most lenders shade rental income, commonly by around 20%, to allow for vacancy, management fees and maintenance. Signed leases and a rental ledger carry more weight than an agent’s appraisal letter, and a property sitting vacant at the time of application may be set aside entirely.

Dividends From Listed Portfolios

Dividend income is generally assessed across two years rather than the most recent one, and consistency counts for more than size. A portfolio weighted toward growth stocks paying little may contribute far less than its market value suggests. Franking credits are usually set aside, since they reduce tax rather than add to monthly cash flow.

Interest on Cash Holdings

Interest from savings and term deposits is simple to verify and modest in most cases. Lenders may also ask whether the capital will stay invested, particularly where some of it is earmarked for the deposit. Statements covering three to six months are the usual request. Where a term deposit matures during the loan, some lenders discount the income because the renewal rate is unknown.

Pensions From Superannuation Accounts

Payments from an account-based pension can be counted where they are regular and expected to continue, and they often sit at the centre of borrowing after 60. Assessors look at the balance supporting those payments and how long it will last, since a pension that runs dry partway through the loan term is a repayment problem, not an income one. Recent pension and member statements are normally required.

Payments From Annuities and Income Streams

Annuity payments may be counted for the period they are contracted to run. A lifetime annuity is viewed more favourably than a short fixed term, because the income does not stop midway through the loan. The product schedule is usually needed to confirm the term and the amount.

Distributions From Managed Funds

Distributions from managed funds and listed investment trusts are treated much like dividends, assessed on a two-year pattern rather than one strong year. Where a distribution includes a return of capital rather than earnings, it may be discounted or set aside, because it is not sustainable income. Annual tax statements from the fund are the usual evidence.

How each income type is treated varies between lenders and is reviewed regularly, so the discounts and evidence described above are a general guide rather than a fixed rule.

Loan Structures That May Suit Asset Rich Borrowers

Where income is genuinely limited, structure does the work a sharper rate cannot. Several arrangements are designed for borrowers whose strength sits on the balance sheet:

Lines of Credit Secured Against Property

A line of credit lets you draw only what you need, with interest charged on the drawn balance. Serviceability is still assessed on the full limit, so it does not sidestep the income test, but it suits lumpy costs and short funding gaps. Discipline matters, because an undrawn limit is easy to treat as savings.

Terms With an Interest-Only Period

An interest-only period lowers the required repayment while it runs, which can bridge the time before an asset sale or a distribution lands. Lenders assess these loans on the higher repayment that applies once principal and interest begins, so the relief is to your cash flow rather than to your assessed capacity. Periods are usually capped and the loan costs more across its life.

Pricing Tied to a Low LVR

Substantial equity does help, through pricing rather than approval. A loan at a low LVR may attract a sharper rate, avoid lenders mortgage insurance and open a wider panel of lenders. Because the assessment rate sits above the actual rate, a sharper rate lifts assessed capacity slightly, which can decide a marginal application.

Security Held Separately Rather Than Combined

Lenders often prefer to hold several properties as one pool of security, which is tidier for them and restrictive for you. Cross-collateralised loans make it harder to sell a single asset, refinance one property or move lenders without unwinding the whole arrangement. Standalone security usually costs a little more to set up and preserves considerably more flexibility.

Facilities From Non-Bank and Private Lenders

Non-bank and private lenders assess differently, weighing asset quality and a credible exit more heavily than a bank would. Rates and fees are higher and terms are shorter, so these facilities generally suit a defined purpose with a clear end date rather than long-term borrowing.

Offset Accounts Holding Idle Capital

Cash parked between investments earns interest that is taxed, while the same money in an offset account reduces the interest charged on your loan and stays available. The saving is usually worth more after tax than the deposit rate it replaces. It does not lift assessed capacity, though it lowers what the debt costs you.

What the 2026 Tax Changes Mean for Property Investors

Investors holding negatively geared property are among the most cash flow constrained borrowers. The measures announced in the 2026-27 Federal Budget received royal assent in June 2026 and take effect from 1 July 2027. The reforms to negative gearing change the arithmetic on established rental property:

Losses Quarantined From Other Income

From 1 July 2027, net rental losses on established residential property acquired after 7.30pm on 12 May 2026 can no longer be deducted against salary or other non-rental income. Those losses may instead be carried forward and applied against future residential rental income or capital gains from residential property.

Properties Held Before Budget Night

Property held at the time of the announcement is not affected and can continue to be negatively geared under the existing rules until it is sold. That protection extends to contracts signed before the cut-off that had not yet settled, because the test runs on contract date rather than settlement date.

Exemptions for Eligible New Builds

Eligible new builds sit outside the negative gearing change. On disposal from 1 July 2027, investors in an eligible new dwelling may also choose which of the two capital gains regimes applies rather than being pushed into one. Property held in widely held trusts and superannuation funds is also exempt, alongside targeted carve-outs including build-to-rent. Commercial property and shares are not affected by the negative gearing measure at all.

Reform to Capital Gains Tax

The 50% capital gains tax discount for individuals, trusts and partnerships is being replaced by cost base indexation together with a minimum tax rate of 30% on net capital gains. The new treatment applies to gains accruing on or after 1 July 2027, so gains built up before that date remain under the current rules.

Effects on Borrowing Capacity

Lenders take account of the after-tax cost of holding an investment property, so a change to what is deductible may flow through to assessed income on affected purchases. The effect will differ between lenders and will not touch grandfathered holdings. Tax treatment is a question for your accountant rather than your broker, though it is worth raising early because it shapes what you can sensibly buy.

Tax rules and lender policies change, and how these measures apply depends on your own circumstances, so treat the summary above as a general guide and confirm the detail with a registered tax agent.

Strengthening an Application Before You Lodge It

Preparation matters more here, because an assessor is building an income picture from several sources rather than reading a payslip:

Documenting Every Income Stream

Rental ledgers, signed leases, dividend statements, distribution notices and pension statements each need to be current. Two years of evidence is the common request for anything that varies. Gaps tend to be read as unreliability rather than as an oversight.

Reducing Undrawn Credit Limits

Credit cards and lines of credit are assessed at the full limit, not the balance owing. An unused $50,000 facility can cost a meaningful slice of borrowing capacity for no benefit. Closing or reducing limits is one of the quickest improvements available to most applicants.

Restructuring Debt Before Applying

Consolidating several facilities into one loan at a lower rate reduces the repayment burden counted against you. Where an investment facility carries a short remaining term, refinancing it over a longer period lowers the monthly commitment an assessor has to allow for.

Timing an Asset Sale Deliberately

Where part of the portfolio is going to be sold anyway, selling before you apply turns an unhelpful asset into a deposit and takes its holding costs out of the assessment. Capital gains consequences make the timing worth working through with your accountant first.

Setting Out a Repayment Plan

Assessors want to know how the loan gets repaid if income does not improve. A short written plan naming the source, the timing and a fallback answers that question better than a general expectation of future growth.

Reviewing Declared Living Expenses

Lenders compare the household expenses you declare against benchmark figures and assess on the higher of the two. Households with substantial assets often report generously, including discretionary spending that could be trimmed, and every dollar of it reduces borrowing capacity. Working through the figures honestly before you apply is one of the few levers still in your control.

Being Asset Rich Still Works in Your Favour

The assumption behind most of these declines is that a lender weighed your whole position and found it wanting. A serviceability calculator ran one narrow test, and that test does not see the balance sheet behind it.

That test varies between lenders far more than borrowers expect. Shading on rent, treatment of dividends, appetite for standalone security and willingness to price against a low LVR all differ, and those differences decide outcomes more often than the quality of the assets behind them.

Where the income is genuinely thin, a home loans broker who works regularly with asset-backed applications can match your position to the lenders whose policies fit it, and tell you early where the ceiling sits. That is the work Loanworx Group does with borrowers across Melbourne, and knowing your real number before you commit to a purchase changes what you go looking for.

If you are asset rich and short on assessable income, our team is happy to talk it through before you go any further.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Can I get a home loan if I have significant assets but low income?

Often yes, though not always from a major bank. Approval turns on whether verifiable income covers the assessed repayment, so the work sits in identifying every countable stream and matching your position to a lender whose policy fits. Where income genuinely cannot support the loan, a shorter-term facility against the asset may be the more realistic path.

2. Do lenders count rental income in full?

Rarely. Most apply a discount, commonly around 20%, and several are more conservative still on holiday lettings or properties with a single tenant. Where the shading leaves a shortfall, the gap has to be covered by other income rather than by the property’s value.

3. Will a large deposit make up for weak serviceability?

Not on its own. A larger deposit reduces the amount you need to service, which helps at the margin, and it sharpens the price. The income test still applies in full, whatever the deposit.

4. Does cross-collateralising my properties help me borrow more?

It can simplify an approval and occasionally lift the amount offered, because the lender holds more security in one place. What it costs you is flexibility later. Many borrowers with multiple assets are better served by standalone security on each.

5. How do the 2026 negative gearing changes affect my borrowing capacity?

Only where an established rental was contracted after 12 May 2026, and not until 1 July 2027. Because deductibility feeds into how a lender weighs the net cost of a rental property, losing it may reduce what you are credited on those purchases. Anything you already held is grandfathered and unaffected.

6. Can I use my share portfolio as security for a home loan?

Not for a standard residential mortgage, which is secured by property. Shares can support your position in other ways, through the dividend income they produce or by being sold to fund a deposit. Separate lending secured against a portfolio exists but carries its own risks, including margin calls.

7. Is a non-bank lender a reasonable option if the banks decline me?

It can be, provided the purpose and the exit are clear. The risk is treating a short-term facility as a long-term solution, which is where the cost compounds. Testing mainstream policy first is usually worth the extra fortnight it takes.

This article contains general information only. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs, and it is not credit, tax or legal advice. Lender policies, tax rules and government settings change over time, and how they apply will depend on your own circumstances. Before acting on anything set out here, consider speaking with a qualified credit adviser, accountant or registered tax agent about your position.